LUMA defends its contract extension before Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court — a NAPREC perspective
LUMA Energy filed a 65-page brief with the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico opposing the government’s effort to void the extension of its contract to operate the transmission and distribution grid, and warned that termination could cost more than $1.3 billion. Original NAPREC analysis in English and Spanish.
PREPA sues New Fortress over $55 million in fuel costs — a NAPREC perspective
The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority sued NFEnergia and related New Fortress companies in federal court, seeking at least $54.9 million over alleged failures to deliver contracted liquefied natural gas from October 2024 through October 2025. Original NAPREC analysis in English and Spanish.
Supreme Court rules on PROMESA and sovereign immunity — a NAPREC perspective
The Supreme Court held that PROMESA did not categorically remove the oversight board’s sovereign immunity. The Court assumed immunity for its analysis without deciding that separate question, in litigation over access to public documents. Original NAPREC analysis in English and Spanish.
Senate confirms Gina Méndez-Miró to the federal district court — a NAPREC perspective
The U.S. Senate confirmed Gina Méndez-Miró as a district judge for Puerto Rico by 54–45. The official roll call records a concrete federal judicial appointment affecting the territory. Original NAPREC analysis in English and Spanish.
Court upholds Puerto Rico’s exclusion from SSI — a NAPREC perspective
In Vaello Madero, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution did not require Congress to extend SSI to Puerto Rico residents. The ruling upheld the statutory distinction; it did not prevent Congress from choosing to expand the program. Original NAPREC analysis in English and Spanish.
Supreme Court hears the SSI case — a NAPREC perspective
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. Vaello Madero. The dispute concerned the exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from Supplemental Security Income, bringing unequal access to federal benefits before the justices. A decision followed in 2022. Original NAPREC analysis in English and Spanish.

